Neurodope Magazine

Most people will never look into all the inconsistencies of the moon landing. They leave the thinking to the government and say as they are told to say, “Anyone who thinks we didn’t land on the moon is an absolute loon.” But if you truly study this you will find that there are so many things that do not add up like: the van allen radiation belts, the flag waving in the wind on the moon where there isn’t wind and the extra light source in the photographs are just a few. Is the story of the moon landing merely a production done in a studio and not on the moon? So was there a Moon Landing Hoax? This classic documentary: “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” reveals some serious inconsistencies.

The Apollo Moon landing is considered one of the most significant achievements in human history. However, despite the overwhelming evidence that supports the event, there are still those who believe that the Moon landing was a hoax. These conspiracy theories are based on various inconsistencies that are believed to exist in the official narrative of the event. In this article, we will explore some of these inconsistencies and examine the evidence that supports and debunks them.

1. The American flag waving on the Moon

One of the most commonly cited pieces of evidence in the Moon landing hoax theory is the American flag. In several photographs, the flag appears to be waving in the wind, even though there is no atmosphere on the Moon. Some conspiracy theorists argue that this is proof that the footage was filmed on Earth, where there is an atmosphere.

However, the flag wasn’t waving because of wind. The flag was attached to a horizontal rod, and as the astronauts were placing it into the ground, the motion caused the flag to ripple and appear as though it was waving. Additionally, the flag was made of lightweight material, so it didn’t remain completely still when deployed.

2. The lack of a blast crater

Another point raised by Moon landing skeptics is the lack of a blast crater under the Lunar Module’s descent engine. They argue that the engine should have created a large crater when it landed on the Moon’s surface.

However, the engine’s power was significantly reduced before it touched the Moon’s surface. Also, the Moon’s surface is composed of a layer of fine dust that is easily disturbed by the descent engine’s thrust. Instead of creating a deep crater, the engine simply compressed the dust and created a shallow depression.

3. The shadows in the Moon landing footage

Some people claim that the shadows in the footage from the Moon landing are inconsistent with the position of the Sun. They argue that the shadows should be pointing in different directions, indicating that multiple light sources were used during filming.

However, the shadows in the footage are entirely consistent with a single light source—the Sun. Because the Moon’s surface is covered in reflective material, light is scattered in all directions, creating multiple shadows. Additionally, the uneven terrain on the Moon’s surface causes shadows to appear in different directions.

4. The lack of stars in the Moon landing footage

Another frequently cited piece of evidence in the Moon landing hoax theory is the lack of stars in the footage. Skeptics argue that the stars should be visible in the black sky of space, and their absence indicates that the footage was filmed on a soundstage on Earth.

However, the cameras used during the Moon landing had a limited dynamic range and exposure time, which made it difficult to capture the faint light of stars in the background. Also, the bright light of the Sun on the Moon’s surface made it difficult to capture any stars in the background.

5. The vanishing Lunar Module

Some conspiracy theorists argue that the Lunar Module disappeared into thin air during liftoff from the Moon’s surface. They suggest that this was done to conceal the fact that the module was never there in the first place.

However, the Lunar Module’s ascent stage wasn’t visible in the footage of liftoff because it was moving away from the camera and was small in comparison to the vast lunar landscape.

In conclusion, despite the many inconsistencies cited by Moon landing skeptics, there is an abundance of evidence that supports the event’s authenticity. The scientific data, physical evidence, and eyewitness accounts all point to the fact that the Moon landing was a monumental achievement that happened exactly as NASA reported it.

At the same time, there are many glaring inconsistencies in the narrative. While conspiracy theories may continue to persist, the overwhelming evidence that supports the Moon landing hoax should be enough to keep the debate alive.